中文版：论光速的相对性
介绍了具有广泛适用性的东方学帝归一原理，该原理可用于检验数学、自然科学和社会科学的逻辑自洽性。基于这一原理，论证了相对论诠释下的洛伦兹变换必然引出完全时空变换的概念，进而导出真空中孤立参照系光速恒定而相对光速可变的两个平行结论。具体而言，相对论意义的洛伦兹变换在数学形式上呈现两种必然推论：1）真空中光相对于观测者所在实验室参照系的传播速度为常数c；2）真空中光相对于其他任何与之存在相对运动的惯性参照系的传播速度则不等于c。典型的特例是：真空中同向传播的光的相对速度为0，反向传播的光的相对速度则为2c。从理论的角度讲，Einstein提出的光速不变假设仅是非完备形式数学计算的结果之一。从实验的角度看，历史上从未出现过光相对于运动物体速度的观测结果，人类也无法测量一束光相对于另一束光的速度。所谓广泛实验证实了真空中光速相对于任何参考系始终恒定的随意描述，不仅在基本数学知识、自然直觉和基本逻辑推理方面存在缺陷，而且在基本学术诚信方面还存在性质严重的缺陷。
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/394250995_lunguangsudexiangduixing
英文版：On the Relativity of the Speed of Light
This article introduces the widely applicable Dongfang unitary principle, which can be used to test the logical consistency of mathematics, natural sciences, and social sciences. Based on this principle, it is demonstrated that the Lorentz transformation under the interpretation of relativity inevitably leads to the concept of complete spatiotemporal transformation, and thus two parallel conclusions are derived that the isolated reference frame in vacuum has a constant speed of light and a variable relative speed of light. Specifically, the Lorentz transformation in the sense of relativity presents two inevitable inferences in mathematical form: 1) the propagation speed of light in a vacuum relative to the reference frame of the observer's laboratory is a constant c; 2) the propagation speed of light in a vacuum relative to any other inertial reference frame in relative motion is not equal to c. A typical exception is that the relative speed of light propagating in the same direction in a vacuum is 0, and the relative speed of light propagating in the opposite direction is 2c. From a theoretical perspective, Einstein's assumption that the speed of light remains constant is only one of the results of incomplete mathematical calculations. From an experimental perspective, there has never been an observation of the velocity of light relative to a moving object in history, and it is impossible for humans to measure the velocity of a beam of light relative to other beams. The so-called extensive experiments have confirmed the description that the speed of light in vacuum is always constant relative to any reference frame, which not only has deficiencies in basic mathematical knowledge, natural intuition, and basic logical reasoning, but also has serious deficiencies in basic academic integrity.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/394250995_lunguangsudexiangduixing
介绍了具有广泛适用性的东方学帝归一原理，该原理可用于检验数学、自然科学和社会科学的逻辑自洽性。基于这一原理，论证了相对论诠释下的洛伦兹变换必然引出完全时空变换的概念，进而导出真空中孤立参照系光速恒定而相对光速可变的两个平行结论。具体而言，相对论意义的洛伦兹变换在数学形式上呈现两种必然推论：1）真空中光相对于观测者所在实验室参照系的传播速度为常数c；2）真空中光相对于其他任何与之存在相对运动的惯性参照系的传播速度则不等于c。典型的特例是：真空中同向传播的光的相对速度为0，反向传播的光的相对速度则为2c。从理论的角度讲，Einstein提出的光速不变假设仅是非完备形式数学计算的结果之一。从实验的角度看，历史上从未出现过光相对于运动物体速度的观测结果，人类也无法测量一束光相对于另一束光的速度。所谓广泛实验证实了真空中光速相对于任何参考系始终恒定的随意描述，不仅在基本数学知识、自然直觉和基本逻辑推理方面存在缺陷，而且在基本学术诚信方面还存在性质严重的缺陷。
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/394250995_lunguangsudexiangduixing
英文版：On the Relativity of the Speed of Light
This article introduces the widely applicable Dongfang unitary principle, which can be used to test the logical consistency of mathematics, natural sciences, and social sciences. Based on this principle, it is demonstrated that the Lorentz transformation under the interpretation of relativity inevitably leads to the concept of complete spatiotemporal transformation, and thus two parallel conclusions are derived that the isolated reference frame in vacuum has a constant speed of light and a variable relative speed of light. Specifically, the Lorentz transformation in the sense of relativity presents two inevitable inferences in mathematical form: 1) the propagation speed of light in a vacuum relative to the reference frame of the observer's laboratory is a constant c; 2) the propagation speed of light in a vacuum relative to any other inertial reference frame in relative motion is not equal to c. A typical exception is that the relative speed of light propagating in the same direction in a vacuum is 0, and the relative speed of light propagating in the opposite direction is 2c. From a theoretical perspective, Einstein's assumption that the speed of light remains constant is only one of the results of incomplete mathematical calculations. From an experimental perspective, there has never been an observation of the velocity of light relative to a moving object in history, and it is impossible for humans to measure the velocity of a beam of light relative to other beams. The so-called extensive experiments have confirmed the description that the speed of light in vacuum is always constant relative to any reference frame, which not only has deficiencies in basic mathematical knowledge, natural intuition, and basic logical reasoning, but also has serious deficiencies in basic academic integrity.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/394250995_lunguangsudexiangduixing
