nding little supporteven in cranial studies) is disproved by genetic analysis.“Both the nuclear PCA and ADMIXTURE analysesindicated a very homogenous gene pool in the OkunevoCulture, in correspondence with the previous genetic studyof the Okunevo by Allentoft et al. (2015)” (Zacho, 2016: 38). However, the presence of several genetic componentsin the Okunev gene pool, indicating past admixture, asin the vast majority of known human groups, is apparent (see (Ibid.: App. 6)): apart from the “Native American”autosomal component proper, whose share is estimated at4.8 %, there is a Western Eurasian component, as Zachocalls it (61.8 %), and a Siberian component (32.6 %).The proportion of both the latter components is high in Native Americans, in the Malta boy (in his genome, the former component predominates), and in the Ust-Ishimmale, dating to ~45 ka BP (in whose genetic makeup bothcomponents are nearly equally represented) (Fu et al.,2014). The smallest component of the Okunev gene pool(0.8 %) is typical of Southeast Asians, making one recall the Far Eastern complex that L.A. Sokolova identi
“核PCA和混合分析均表明奥库尼沃文化中存在非常同质的基因库，这与Allentoft等人（2015年）之前对奥库尼沃进行的基因研究一致”（Zacho，2016:38）。然而，Okunev基因库中存在若干遗传成分，这表明在绝大多数已知的人类群体中，过去存在混合（见同上：App。6） ）：除了“美洲原住民”常染色体组分（其比例估计为4.8%）之外，还有一个西欧亚组分（61.8%）和一个西伯利亚组分（32.6%）。后两个组分在美洲原住民中的比例很高，在马耳他男孩中（在他的基因组中，前一组分占优势），在Ust-Ishimmale，可追溯到约45千年BP（在其基因构成中，两种成分的代表性几乎相同）（Fu等人，2014年）。Okunev基因库中最小的部分（0.8%）是典型的东南亚人，让人想起L.A.Sokolova识别的远东复合体