### 彭大泽 万有斥力理论

“自然界根本不存在万有引力；万有引力是一个错误的科学概念。

彭 大 泽



1楼2011-11-15 16:10回复

那两个学会里面都只有你自己一个人吧？还万有斥力呢。。。给个万有斥力的式子来看看能不能解释自然现象

IP属地:湖南4楼2011-11-15 16:57
回复4楼：

是的。当时这两个学会中只有我一个人是中国人。

5楼2011-11-15 17:03
收起回复
The Theory of Universal Repulsion

Peng Daze

I set up the concept of universal repulsion on July 28, 1979. I affirm that the concept of "universal gravitation" isn't a
correct one in the field of science. There is no natural force of
attraction in nature. The basic interaction between masses is pure and absolute repellent. To repel or to be repelled is the only
mode of motion of matter. Sir Newton's magnificent "inverse-square law" is the brilliant achievement of his own time and the famous
formula is still glittering the talent rays on the interplanetary
exploration, in the field of calculation. In fact, the rocket does overcome the universal repulsion that acts along the line joining
the earth and it. The earth does not attract the rocket although
the repulsion and the "gravity" are equal magnitude. Every natural motion is the result of repulsion. With the theory of universal
repulsion, the inner quality of gravitation has been explained, Sir Isaac Newton's concept of gravitation has been overthrown and the
unified field theory can be established.
Universal repulsion is a fundamental interaction in nature,
every particle of mass in the universe is repelled by the repulsion.
Every particle of mass does not attract every other particle
of mass but repels.
The apparent phenomenon "gravitation" is the result of
repulsion.
Sir Isaac Newton's magnificent "inverse-square law" is correct in the calculation of magnitude. It should be called the law of
universal repulsion: the law that every two particles of matter in
the universe repulse each other with a force that acts along the
line joining them, and has a magnitude proportional to the product
of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the
distance between them.

(RESEARCH ABSTRACTS, 1985, vol.10, no.2, p.36，
University Microfilms International,
Michigan,USA)

6楼2011-11-15 17:24
The Theory of Universal Repulsion
Peng Daze
I set up the concept of universal repulsion on July 28, 1979. I affirm that the concept of "universal gravitation" isn't a correct one in the field of science. There is no natural force of attraction in nature. The basic interaction between masses is pure and absolute repellent. To repel or to be repelled is the only mode of motion of matter. Sir Newton's magnificent "inverse-square law" is the brilliant achievement of his own time and the famous formula is still glittering the talent rays on the interplanetary exploration, in the field of calculation. In fact, the rocket does overcome the universal repulsion that acts along the line joining the earth and it. The earth does not attract the rocket although the repulsion and the "gravity" are equal magnitude. Every natural motion is the result of repulsion. With the theory of universal repulsion, the inner quality of gravitation has been explained, Sir Isaac Newton's concept of gravitation has been overthrown and the unified field theory can be established.
Universal repulsion is a fundamental interaction in nature, every particle of mass in the universe is repelled by the repulsion.
Every particle of mass does not attract every other particle of mass but repels.
The apparent phenomenon "gravitation" is the result of repulsion.
Sir Isaac Newton's magnificent "inverse-square law" is correct in the calculation of magnitude. It should be called the law of universal repulsion: the law that every two particles of matter in the universe repulse each other with a force that acts along the line joining them, and has a magnitude proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them.

(RESEARCH ABSTRACTS, 1985, vol.10, no.2, p.36，
University Microfilms International, Michigan,ＵＳＡ)

7楼2011-11-15 17:25
收起回复
对不起，这里的英文版式叫人头疼。

8楼2011-11-15 17:26
收起回复
你都没有证明“万有引力”怎么错了；也没有证明“万有斥力”存在的证据，凭什么让别人相信你的“理论”呢？

IP属地:江苏9楼2011-11-15 17:55
收起回复
大小一样，方向相反，怎么解释天体运动现象？
还有为什么按牛顿的来可以造出火箭？他理论能用至少说明在这些领域是没错的对吧

IP属地:辽宁10楼2011-11-15 17:56
收起回复
世界潮流浩浩荡荡，
傻大木绞了，卡扎菲毙了，地球好小啊！

可不可以小小进一步嘛：
可不可以请求本吧可以给出链接，可以显示自己的电子邮箱？
酱紫方便得多。 谢谢。

14楼2011-11-15 20:52
如果真是斥力，那地球围绕太阳公转的向心力是由什么提供的？

IP属地:江苏15楼2011-11-15 20:55
收起回复
个人认为“万有斥力”在绝对的相对逻辑中是正确的，是惯性力。
表示下支持。

IP属地:陕西16楼2011-11-15 21:04
收起回复
楼主在新华论坛咆哮过？

IP属地:陕西17楼2011-11-15 21:05
收起回复
海　王　星　的　发　现

天文学家赫歇尔在一七八一年意外地发现了天王星后，天文学家根据观测计算出了天王星的运行表。可是，不久就发现天王星被观测到的运行位置与星历表上的预推不甚相合，而且差异迅速增大。天文学家正确地考虑到这可能是由于天王星轨道之外还有一颗行星所起的摄动作用引起的，并且完成了从摄动的效果去求出未知的摄动星这一难题。一八四六年八月三十一日，巴黎天文台的天文学家勒威耶向法国科学院送呈了他一系列研究报告中的最后一篇论文《论使天王星运行失常的行星，它的质量、轨道和现在位置的决定》。几个星期之后，一八四六年的九月二十五日，根据勒威耶所计算得来的未知行星的轨道根数，德国天文学家加耳真的发现了海王星！离勒威耶提供的位置相差不到一度。海王星被称为“笔尖下发现的行星”，海王星的发现被认为是“牛顿的理论最高的光荣和最后的印证”而载入史册。
但是，考虑到行星在银河系中的位置，三千亿颗燃烧、爆炸、辐射着的恒星产生的推压力施加在两行星间的排斥作用才是行星摄动的真实原因，海王星的发现完全应该用图二所示原理来作重新解释。
即：万有斥力才是引起行星摄动的根本原因。

图一 图二

本来应该运行到A处的天王星 考虑到行星在宇宙中的位置，亿万个燃烧、
实际上在B处被观测到，按万 爆炸、辐射着的恒星构成万有斥力场，是
有引力理论，这是由于在C处 排斥力R引起了行星的摄动。
的海王星的吸引引起的。

结论：由于在C处的海王星的摄动，本来应该运行到A处的天王星实际上在B处被观测到。

海王星的发现应该用万有斥力理论来作正确解释

【由于排版原因，上文无法将对应的示意图显示。重发。抱歉。】

18楼2011-11-15 21:21
回复15楼：

请见拙作"黛安娜之诞生”一文。附奉。

黛安娜之诞生 太阳系之起源

彭 大 泽

１、 视太阳系所在旋臂为两岸是恒星的河道；以氢为主的星际物质进入时由于受到银心方向星际风的作用沿旋臂方向加速运动，并且得到由沿途新老恒星抛射出来的重元素和能量。

２、 当流经左岸突出的星岸河道时，一段大于太阳系质量的星际物质产生旋涡，成为作逆时针方向旋转球形继续运动并且继续得到沿途恒星抛掷的重元素和能量。重元素被推向球心，轻元素分布在球体外层。整个球体持续增长其速度、温度、质量。

３、 当原太阳气体球的质量和温度超过临界点时，发生热核反应，太阳在银河赤道面位置爆发。

４、 基于爆发时在银河旋臂中的位置及受力条件，太阳初期的多次间歇爆发形成十个绕日运动的物质环，其轨道共面、同向、近圆。各环之间满足波德定律的距离关系实际上反映了十次爆发的间隔时间。

５、 地球月亮来源于倒数第三次爆发。地月环在产生时主要在以下三个方面得到加速度：一、地月物质环径向加速运动，直至该环半径膨胀至一个天文单位；二、逆时针方向旋转的地月物质环绕日运动一圈速度为一年，地球公转力即来源于此。三、地月物质环体本身加速绕其中心轴线滚转，每转速度为一天，地球自转力即来源于此。

６、 根据基于万有斥力理论的潮汐理论，在太阳及银河中心连线上存在一斥力起潮坝。旋转滚转的地月物质环被该坝在高潮和低潮处切断后，逐渐形成大小两个在同一轨道上绕日公转并逆时针自转物质球。重元素物质被推向球心，轻元素物质在球体外层。运行中两球最终相撞爆炸，原地球在爆炸中诞生同时在其赤道面上伴随产生一个每月绕地旋转一周的滚转月亮物质环。

７、 在太阳地球连线上的斥力起潮坝将绕地旋转的月亮物质环一分为二在高潮和低潮处切断，形成大小两个绕地旋转物质球。运行中两球最终相撞爆炸，月球在爆炸中产生。作为巨大的流星雨，岩石落回原月，在其表面造成环形山。地球拥有了她的卫星：月亮。

８、 其余围绕太阳的九个环均发生上述过程，于是先后构成了从水星、小行星到冥王星等行星。

以上便是太阳系起源之重要过程。

20楼2011-11-15 21:28
收起回复
个人认为楼主的观点是时空的惯性膨胀力。
个人肯定“万有斥力”比“万有引力”更绝对。

IP属地:陕西21楼2011-11-15 21:33